Proof By Induction: Sum Of Arithmetic Series

by Alex Johnson 45 views

Let's dive into a fascinating mathematical concept: proof by induction. Today, we're going to use it to demonstrate a specific formula for the sum of an arithmetic series. Specifically, we aim to prove that if the statement Sk:19+38+57+…+19k=19k(k+1)2S_k: 19+38+57+\ldots+19 k=\frac{19 k(k+1)}{2} is true for some natural number kk, then the statement Sk+1:19+38+57+…+19k+19(k+1)=19(k+1)(k+2)2S_{k+1}: 19+38+57+\ldots+19 k+19(k+1)=\frac{19(k+1)(k+2)}{2} is also true. We will also rewrite the left side of Sk+1S_{k+1} to express it as 19+38+57+…+19k+19(k+1)=□+19(k+1)19+38+57+\ldots+19 k+19(k+1)=\square+19(k+1), identifying what should go in the blank.

Understanding Mathematical Induction

Mathematical induction is a powerful technique used to prove statements that hold for all natural numbers. It's like setting up a line of dominoes; if you can knock down the first domino, and if each domino knocks down the next, then you can be sure all the dominoes will fall. There are typically two main steps:

  1. Base Case: Show that the statement is true for the smallest natural number (usually k=1k = 1).
  2. Inductive Step: Assume the statement is true for some arbitrary natural number kk (the inductive hypothesis), and then prove that it must also be true for k+1k + 1.

If we can successfully complete these two steps, the principle of mathematical induction tells us that the statement is true for all natural numbers.

Defining SkS_k and Sk+1S_{k+1}

We are given the statement Sk:19+38+57+…+19k=19k(k+1)2S_k: 19+38+57+\ldots+19 k=\frac{19 k(k+1)}{2}. This statement proposes a formula for the sum of the first kk terms of an arithmetic series where each term is a multiple of 19. The series starts with 19, then 38, then 57, and so on, up to 19k19k.

Our goal is to prove Sk+1:19+38+57+…+19k+19(k+1)=19(k+1)(k+2)2S_{k+1}: 19+38+57+\ldots+19 k+19(k+1)=\frac{19(k+1)(k+2)}{2}. This statement extends the sum to the first k+1k+1 terms, including the term 19(k+1)19(k+1). We want to show that if SkS_k is true, then Sk+1S_{k+1} must also be true.

Rewriting the Left Side of Sk+1S_{k+1}

Before we dive into the full induction proof, let's focus on rewriting the left side of the Sk+1S_{k+1} equation. This will make the inductive step clearer. The left side is:

19+38+57+…+19k+19(k+1)19+38+57+\ldots+19 k+19(k+1)

We want to express this in the form □+19(k+1)\square + 19(k+1). Notice that the terms 19+38+57+…+19k19+38+57+\ldots+19k are exactly the terms that SkS_k describes. Therefore, we can directly replace these terms with the right side of the SkS_k equation, which is 19k(k+1)2\frac{19 k(k+1)}{2}.

So, we have:

19+38+57+…+19k+19(k+1)=19k(k+1)2+19(k+1)19+38+57+\ldots+19 k+19(k+1) = \frac{19 k(k+1)}{2} + 19(k+1)

This means that the blank â–¡\square should be filled with 19k(k+1)2\frac{19 k(k+1)}{2}. This rewriting step is crucial because it connects Sk+1S_{k+1} back to SkS_k, which is the foundation of the inductive step.

Proof of Sk+1S_{k+1} by Induction

Now, let's proceed with the complete proof by induction.

1. Base Case

We need to show that SkS_k is true for the smallest natural number, which is k=1k=1. So we want to check if S1S_1 is true.

S1:19(1)=19(1)(1+1)2S_1: 19(1) = \frac{19(1)(1+1)}{2} 19=19(2)219 = \frac{19(2)}{2} 19=1919 = 19

The base case holds true.

2. Inductive Step

Assume SkS_k is true for some arbitrary natural number kk. This is our inductive hypothesis:

Sk:19+38+57+…+19k=19k(k+1)2S_k: 19+38+57+\ldots+19 k=\frac{19 k(k+1)}{2}

We need to prove that Sk+1S_{k+1} is also true, which is:

Sk+1:19+38+57+…+19k+19(k+1)=19(k+1)(k+2)2S_{k+1}: 19+38+57+\ldots+19 k+19(k+1)=\frac{19(k+1)(k+2)}{2}

Starting with the left side of Sk+1S_{k+1}, we have:

19+38+57+…+19k+19(k+1)19+38+57+\ldots+19 k+19(k+1)

Using our rewriting from earlier, we substitute the sum of the first kk terms with 19k(k+1)2\frac{19 k(k+1)}{2} based on our inductive hypothesis:

19k(k+1)2+19(k+1)\frac{19 k(k+1)}{2} + 19(k+1)

Now, we want to manipulate this expression to match the right side of Sk+1S_{k+1}, which is 19(k+1)(k+2)2\frac{19(k+1)(k+2)}{2}. Let's factor out the common term 19(k+1)19(k+1):

19(k+1)(k2+1)19(k+1) \left( \frac{k}{2} + 1 \right)

To combine the terms inside the parenthesis, we need a common denominator:

19(k+1)(k2+22)19(k+1) \left( \frac{k}{2} + \frac{2}{2} \right)

19(k+1)(k+22)19(k+1) \left( \frac{k+2}{2} \right)

Now, we can rewrite this as:

19(k+1)(k+2)2\frac{19(k+1)(k+2)}{2}

This is exactly the right side of Sk+1S_{k+1}. Therefore, we have shown that if SkS_k is true, then Sk+1S_{k+1} is also true.

Conclusion

By successfully demonstrating both the base case and the inductive step, we have proven by mathematical induction that the formula Sk:19+38+57+…+19k=19k(k+1)2S_k: 19+38+57+\ldots+19 k=\frac{19 k(k+1)}{2} holds for all natural numbers kk. We also showed that the left side of Sk+1S_{k+1} can be rewritten as 19k(k+1)2+19(k+1)\frac{19 k(k+1)}{2} + 19(k+1). This showcases the power and elegance of mathematical induction in proving statements about sequences and series.

For further reading on mathematical induction, check out this resource on Wikipedia.